From f991519c197534811046e5e47389b6fafcdf1e48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Januszewski Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 23:49:51 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] vt: fix potential race in VT_WAITACTIVE handler On a multiprocessor machine the VT_WAITACTIVE ioctl call may return 0 if fg_console has already been updated in redraw_screen() but the console switch itself hasn't been completed. Fix this by checking fg_console in vt_waitactive() with the console sem held. Signed-off-by: Michal Januszewski Acked-by: Antonino Daplas Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c index 1fa2da8f4f..c9f2dd620e 100644 --- a/drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/char/vt_ioctl.c @@ -1039,10 +1039,22 @@ int vt_waitactive(int vt) add_wait_queue(&vt_activate_queue, &wait); for (;;) { - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); retval = 0; - if (vt == fg_console) + + /* + * Synchronize with redraw_screen(). By acquiring the console + * semaphore we make sure that the console switch is completed + * before we return. If we didn't wait for the semaphore, we + * could return at a point where fg_console has already been + * updated, but the console switch hasn't been completed. + */ + acquire_console_sem(); + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + if (vt == fg_console) { + release_console_sem(); break; + } + release_console_sem(); retval = -EINTR; if (signal_pending(current)) break; -- 2.39.5