From f3d73707a1e84f0687a05144b70b660441e999c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 02:14:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] x86-64: Mark rdtsc as sync only for netburst, not for core2 On the Core2 cpus, the rdtsc instruction is not serializing (as defined in the architecture reference since rdtsc exists) and due to the deep speculation of these cores, it's possible that you can observe time go backwards between cores due to this speculation. Since the kernel already deals with this with the SYNC_RDTSC flag, the solution is simple, only assume that the instruction is serializing on family 15... The price one pays for this is a slightly slower gettimeofday (by a dozen or two cycles), but that increase is quite small to pay for a really-going-forward tsc counter. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen --- arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c index 05eaca4180..6595a4ebe7 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c @@ -860,7 +860,10 @@ static void __cpuinit init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, &c->x86_capability); if (c->x86 == 6) set_bit(X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD, &c->x86_capability); - set_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability); + if (c->x86 == 15) + set_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability); + else + clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability); c->x86_max_cores = intel_num_cpu_cores(c); srat_detect_node(); -- 2.39.5