From f1452d424dc0e079fb97af8cb8d3a0f7b5fddd46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Harvey Harrison Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:23:53 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86, kprobes: remove sparse warnings from x86 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c:584:16: warning: symbol 'kretprobe_trampoline_holder' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c:676:6: warning: symbol 'trampoline_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? Make them static and add the __used attribute, approach taken from the arm kprobes implementation. kretprobe_trampoline_holder uses inline assemly to define the global symbol kretprobe_trampoline, but nothing ever calls the holder explicitly. trampoline handler is only called from inline assembly in the same file, mark it used and static. Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c index a99e764fd6..34a591283f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) * When a retprobed function returns, this code saves registers and * calls trampoline_handler() runs, which calls the kretprobe's handler. */ -void __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void) +static void __used __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void) { asm volatile ( ".global kretprobe_trampoline\n" @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ void __kprobes kretprobe_trampoline_holder(void) /* * Called from kretprobe_trampoline */ -void * __kprobes trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) +static __used __kprobes void *trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL; struct hlist_head *head, empty_rp; -- 2.39.5