From e4b69aa2a1bcee21f8d5e089b8682dd8aaace5eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kenneth Lee Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:15:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] bug fix in kernel/kmod.c I think there is a bug in kmod.c: In __call_usermodehelper(), when kernel_thread(wait_for_helper, ...) return success, since wait_for_helper() might call complete() at any time, the sub_info should not be used any more. Normally wait_for_helper() take a long time to finish, you may not get problem for most of the case. But if you remove /sbin/modprobe, it may become easier for you to get a oop in khelper. Cc: Matt Helsley Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/kmod.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c index 1d32defa38..5c470c57fb 100644 --- a/kernel/kmod.c +++ b/kernel/kmod.c @@ -197,11 +197,12 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *data) { struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data; pid_t pid; + int wait = sub_info->wait; /* CLONE_VFORK: wait until the usermode helper has execve'd * successfully We need the data structures to stay around * until that is done. */ - if (sub_info->wait) + if (wait) pid = kernel_thread(wait_for_helper, sub_info, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | SIGCHLD); else @@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(void *data) if (pid < 0) { sub_info->retval = pid; complete(sub_info->complete); - } else if (!sub_info->wait) + } else if (!wait) complete(sub_info->complete); } -- 2.39.5