From e0138a66e18c6755ee29ce13b3f1142af775dc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jay Vosburgh Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:24:58 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] bonding: fix ASSERT_RTNL that produces spurious warnings Move an ASSERT_RTNL down to where we should hold only RTNL; the existing check produces spurious warnings because we hold additional locks at _bh, tripping a debug warning in spin_lock_mutex(). Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c index 25b8dbf6cf..9b55a123c0 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c @@ -1601,9 +1601,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave struct slave *swap_slave; int i; - if (new_slave) - ASSERT_RTNL(); - if (bond->curr_active_slave == new_slave) { return; } @@ -1649,6 +1646,8 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock); read_unlock(&bond->lock); + ASSERT_RTNL(); + /* curr_active_slave must be set before calling alb_swap_mac_addr */ if (swap_slave) { /* swap mac address */ -- 2.39.5