From d40860f8e2edb31196f4233d3691704d313dbdd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trent Piepho Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:55:00 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] V4L/DVB (5427): M920x: Improve I2C operations Write some better documentation about what might be known about how the m920x I2C works, since a datasheet is lacking. The I2C xfer function should now handle more types of I2C transactions than it could before. Those it can't, will return error codes instead of being executed incorrectly. Multi-byte reads were not being done correctly, which should be fixed. Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.c | 52 +++++++++++++++---------------- drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.h | 28 ++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.c b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.c index 621819f659..08469ccabb 100644 --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.c +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.c @@ -141,43 +141,43 @@ static int m9206_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msg[], int i, j; int ret = 0; + if (!num) + return -EINVAL; + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->i2c_mutex) < 0) return -EAGAIN; for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { - if (msg[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) { - - if ((ret = m9206_write(d->udev, M9206_I2C, (msg[i].addr << 1) | 0x01, 0x80)) != 0) + if (msg[i].flags & (I2C_M_NO_RD_ACK|I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK|I2C_M_TEN)) { + ret = -ENOTSUPP; + goto unlock; + } + /* Send START & address/RW bit */ + if (!(msg[i].flags & I2C_M_NOSTART)) { + if ((ret = m9206_write(d->udev, M9206_I2C, (msg[i].addr<<1)|(msg[i].flags&I2C_M_RD?0x01:00), 0x80)) != 0) goto unlock; - - for(j = 0; j < msg[i].len; j++) { - if (j + 1 == msg[i].len && i + 1== num) { - if ((ret = m9206_read(d->udev, M9206_I2C, 0x0, 0x60, &msg[i].buf[j], msg[i].len)) != 0) - goto unlock; - } else { - if ((ret = m9206_read(d->udev, M9206_I2C, 0x0, 0x21, &msg[i].buf[j], msg[i].len)) != 0) - goto unlock; - } + /* Should check for ack here, if we knew how. */ + } + if (msg[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) { + for (j = 0; j < msg[i].len; j++) { + /* Last byte of transaction? Send STOP, otherwise send ACK. */ + int stop = (i+1 == num && j+1 == msg[i].len)?0x40:0x01; + if ((ret = m9206_read(d->udev, M9206_I2C, 0x0, 0x20|stop, &msg[i].buf[j], 1)) != 0) + goto unlock; } - } else { - if ((ret = m9206_write(d->udev, M9206_I2C, msg[i].addr << 1, 0x80)) != 0) - goto unlock; - - for(j = 0; j < msg[i].len; j++) { - if (j + 1 == msg[i].len && i + 1== num) { - if ((ret = m9206_write(d->udev, M9206_I2C, msg[i].buf[j], 0x40)) != 0) - goto unlock; - - } else { - if ((ret = m9206_write(d->udev, M9206_I2C, msg[i].buf[j], 0x0)) != 0) - goto unlock; - } + for (j = 0; j < msg[i].len; j++) { + /* Last byte of transaction? Then send STOP. */ + int stop = (i+1 == num && j+1 == msg[i].len)?0x40:0x00; + if ((ret = m9206_write(d->udev, M9206_I2C, msg[i].buf[j], stop)) != 0) + goto unlock; + /* Should check for ack here too. */ } } } ret = num; - unlock: + +unlock: mutex_unlock(&d->i2c_mutex); return ret; diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.h b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.h index c5ef592cbf..7dd3db65c8 100644 --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.h +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/m920x.h @@ -37,13 +37,27 @@ this sequence works: (0x21 in byte)* 0x60 in byte -_my guess_: -0x80: begin i2c transfer using address. value=address<<1|(reading?1:0) -0x00: write byte -0x21: read byte, more to follow -0x40: write last byte of message sequence -0x60: read last byte of message sequence - */ +Guess at API of the I2C function: +I2C operation is done one byte at a time with USB control messages. The +index the messages is sent to is made up of a set of flags that control +the I2C bus state: +0x80: Send START condition. After a START condition, one would normally + always send the 7-bit slave I2C address as the 7 MSB, followed by + the read/write bit as the LSB. +0x40: Send STOP condition. This should be set on the last byte of an + I2C transaction. +0x20: Read a byte from the slave. As opposed to writing a byte to the + slave. The slave will normally not produce any data unless you + set the R/W bit to 1 when sending the slave's address after the + START condition. +0x01: Respond with ACK, as opposed to a NACK. For a multi-byte read, + the master should send an ACK, that is pull SDA low during the 9th + clock cycle, after every byte but the last. This flags only makes + sense when bit 0x20 is set, indicating a read. + +What any other bits might mean, or how to get the slave's ACK/NACK +response to a write, is unknown. +*/ struct m9206_state { u16 filters[M9206_MAX_FILTERS]; -- 2.39.5