From d07355f5def74d060333563b36ab51b89fd44cdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Adamushko Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:21:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sched: check for SD_SERIALIZE atomically in rebalance_domains() Nothing really serious here, mainly just a matter of nit-picking :-/ From: Dmitry Adamushko For CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG && CONFIG_SYSCT configs, sd->flags can be altered while being manipulated in rebalance_domains(). Let's do an atomic check. We rely here on the atomicity of read/write accesses for aligned words. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/sched.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 8a1257b655..90329f1f89 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -3668,6 +3668,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle) /* Earliest time when we have to do rebalance again */ unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + 60*HZ; int update_next_balance = 0; + int need_serialize; cpumask_t tmp; for_each_domain(cpu, sd) { @@ -3685,8 +3686,9 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle) if (interval > HZ*NR_CPUS/10) interval = HZ*NR_CPUS/10; + need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE; - if (sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE) { + if (need_serialize) { if (!spin_trylock(&balancing)) goto out; } @@ -3702,7 +3704,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle) } sd->last_balance = jiffies; } - if (sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE) + if (need_serialize) spin_unlock(&balancing); out: if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) { -- 2.39.5