From cc996099174dc05b35b7a29301026987990e7f8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexey Dobriyan Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 07:30:48 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] proc: inode number fixlet Ouch, if number taken from IDA is too big, the intent was to signal an error, not check for overflow and still do overflowing addition. One still needs 2^28 proc entries to notice this. Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/proc/generic.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c index 4fb81e9c94..bca0f81eb6 100644 --- a/fs/proc/generic.c +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ retry: spin_lock(&proc_inum_lock); ida_remove(&proc_inum_ida, i); spin_unlock(&proc_inum_lock); + return 0; } return PROC_DYNAMIC_FIRST + i; } -- 2.39.5