From c97d20a6c51067a38f53680d9609b4cf2867d077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:44:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] i386: Do backtrace fallback too Similar patch to earlier x86-64 patch. When the dwarf2 unwinder fails dump the left over stack with the old unwinder. Also some clarifications in the headers. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/i386/kernel/traps.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c index 313ac1f7dc..3facc8fcb9 100644 --- a/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c @@ -187,10 +187,21 @@ static void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, if (unwind_init_blocked(&info, task) == 0) unw_ret = show_trace_unwind(&info, log_lvl); } - if (unw_ret > 0) { - if (call_trace > 0) + if (unw_ret > 0 && !arch_unw_user_mode(&info)) { +#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_UNWIND + print_symbol("DWARF2 unwinder stuck at %s\n", + UNW_PC(info.regs)); + if (call_trace == 1) { + printk("Leftover inexact backtrace:\n"); + if (UNW_SP(info.regs)) + stack = (void *)UNW_SP(info.regs); + } else if (call_trace > 1) return; - printk("%sLegacy call trace:\n", log_lvl); + else + printk("Full inexact backtrace again:\n"); +#else + printk("Inexact backtrace:\n"); +#endif } } -- 2.39.5