From c6e54a578133fb353a50fb44d650768b3b9eb18e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Albert Lee Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 15:00:37 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] libata: remove irq_on from ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset() It seems irq_on() in ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset() are leftover of the EDD reset. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Albert Lee Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 7 ------- drivers/ata/pata_scc.c | 4 ---- 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index e127b73e32..88e2dd0983 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -3164,9 +3164,6 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap) if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81)) ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err); - /* re-enable interrupts */ - ap->ops->irq_on(ap); - /* is double-select really necessary? */ if (ap->device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE) ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1); @@ -3551,10 +3548,6 @@ void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes) if (sata_scr_read(ap, SCR_ERROR, &serror) == 0) sata_scr_write(ap, SCR_ERROR, serror); - /* re-enable interrupts */ - if (!ap->ops->error_handler) - ap->ops->irq_on(ap); - /* is double-select really necessary? */ if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE) ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1); diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c b/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c index 274fabfc90..c55667e0eb 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c @@ -912,10 +912,6 @@ static void scc_std_postreset (struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes) { DPRINTK("ENTER\n"); - /* re-enable interrupts */ - if (!ap->ops->error_handler) - ap->ops->irq_on(ap); - /* is double-select really necessary? */ if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE) ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1); -- 2.39.5