From bd5349cfd2b9bbb10a3dbcd3fe5cbaabe0b2ab9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Neil Brown Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:10:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] Convert cpu hotplug notifiers to use raw_notifier instead of blocking_notifier The use of blocking notifier by _cpu_up and _cpu_down in cpu.c has two problem. 1/ An interaction with the workqueue notifier causes lockdep to spit a warning. 2/ A notifier could conceivable be added or removed while _cpu_up or _cpu_down are in process. As each notifier is called twice (prepare then commit/abort) this could be unhealthy. To fix to we simply take cpu_add_remove_lock while adding or removing notifiers to/from the list. This makes the 'blocking' usage unnecessary as all accesses to cpu_chain are now protected by cpu_add_remove_lock. So change "blocking" to "raw" in all relevant places. This fixes 1. Credit: Andrew Morton Cc: Rusty Russell Cc: Michal Piotrowski (reporter) Signed-off-by: Neil Brown Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/cpu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 32c9662846..27dd3ee470 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_add_remove_lock); static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpu_bitmask_lock); -static __cpuinitdata BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain); +static __cpuinitdata RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_chain); /* If set, cpu_up and cpu_down will return -EBUSY and do nothing. * Should always be manipulated under cpu_add_remove_lock @@ -68,7 +68,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug); /* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */ int __cpuinit register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) { - return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb); + int ret; + mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock); + ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb); + mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock); + return ret; } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -77,7 +81,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier); void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb) { - blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb); + mutex_lock(&cpu_add_remove_lock); + raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb); + mutex_unlock(&cpu_add_remove_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier); @@ -126,7 +132,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu) if (!cpu_online(cpu)) return -EINVAL; - err = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE, + err = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE, (void *)(long)cpu); if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) { printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n", @@ -146,7 +152,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu) if (IS_ERR(p)) { /* CPU didn't die: tell everyone. Can't complain. */ - if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED, + if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_FAILED, (void *)(long)cpu) == NOTIFY_BAD) BUG(); @@ -169,7 +175,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu) put_cpu(); /* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone. Too late to complain. */ - if (blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD, + if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD, (void *)(long)cpu) == NOTIFY_BAD) BUG(); @@ -206,7 +212,7 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu) if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu)) return -EINVAL; - ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu); + ret = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu); if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) { printk("%s: attempt to bring up CPU %u failed\n", __FUNCTION__, cpu); @@ -223,11 +229,11 @@ static int __devinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu) BUG_ON(!cpu_online(cpu)); /* Now call notifier in preparation. */ - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE, hcpu); + raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_ONLINE, hcpu); out_notify: if (ret != 0) - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, + raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_CANCELED, hcpu); return ret; -- 2.39.5