From bb44f116a14c4c932f15c79acfafd46bcb43ca9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:54:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] fix spinlock-debugging smp_processor_id() usage When a spinlock debugging check hits, we print the CPU number as an informational thing - but there is no guarantee that preemption is off at that point - hence we should use raw_smp_processor_id(). Otherwise DEBUG_PREEMPT will print a warning. With this fix the warning goes away and only the spinlock-debugging info is printed. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- lib/spinlock_debug.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/spinlock_debug.c b/lib/spinlock_debug.c index 906ad101ea..dcd4be9bd4 100644 --- a/lib/spinlock_debug.c +++ b/lib/spinlock_debug.c @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ static void spin_bug(spinlock_t *lock, const char *msg) if (lock->owner && lock->owner != SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT) owner = lock->owner; printk("BUG: spinlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d\n", - msg, smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid); + msg, raw_smp_processor_id(), + current->comm, current->pid); printk(" lock: %p, .magic: %08x, .owner: %s/%d, .owner_cpu: %d\n", lock, lock->magic, owner ? owner->comm : "", @@ -78,8 +79,8 @@ static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t *lock) if (print_once) { print_once = 0; printk("BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n", - smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid, - lock); + raw_smp_processor_id(), current->comm, + current->pid, lock); dump_stack(); } } @@ -120,7 +121,8 @@ static void rwlock_bug(rwlock_t *lock, const char *msg) if (xchg(&print_once, 0)) { printk("BUG: rwlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n", msg, - smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid, lock); + raw_smp_processor_id(), current->comm, + current->pid, lock); dump_stack(); #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* @@ -148,8 +150,8 @@ static void __read_lock_debug(rwlock_t *lock) if (print_once) { print_once = 0; printk("BUG: read-lock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n", - smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid, - lock); + raw_smp_processor_id(), current->comm, + current->pid, lock); dump_stack(); } } @@ -220,8 +222,8 @@ static void __write_lock_debug(rwlock_t *lock) if (print_once) { print_once = 0; printk("BUG: write-lock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, %p\n", - smp_processor_id(), current->comm, current->pid, - lock); + raw_smp_processor_id(), current->comm, + current->pid, lock); dump_stack(); } } -- 2.39.5