From b9df3cb8cf9a96e63dfdcd3056a9cbc71f2459e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerrit Renker Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:21:36 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] [TCP/DCCP]: Introduce net_xmit_eval Throughout the TCP/DCCP (and tunnelling) code, it often happens that the return code of a transmit function needs to be tested against NET_XMIT_CN which is a value that does not indicate a strict error condition. This patch uses a macro for these recurring situations which is consistent with the already existing macro net_xmit_errno, saving on duplicated code. Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- include/linux/netdevice.h | 4 ++++ include/net/ipip.h | 2 +- net/dccp/ipv4.c | 5 ++--- net/dccp/ipv6.c | 3 +-- net/dccp/output.c | 14 ++------------ net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 3 +-- net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 8 +------- net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 3 +-- 9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index 4e967b2e22..caa3c25937 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ struct netpoll_info; #define NET_RX_CN_HIGH 4 /* The storm is here */ #define NET_RX_BAD 5 /* packet dropped due to kernel error */ +/* NET_XMIT_CN is special. It does not guarantee that this packet is lost. It + * indicates that the device will soon be dropping packets, or already drops + * some packets of the same priority; prompting us to send less aggressively. */ +#define net_xmit_eval(e) ((e) == NET_XMIT_CN? 0 : (e)) #define net_xmit_errno(e) ((e) != NET_XMIT_CN ? -ENOBUFS : 0) #endif diff --git a/include/net/ipip.h b/include/net/ipip.h index f490c3cbe3..84058858ee 100644 --- a/include/net/ipip.h +++ b/include/net/ipip.h @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct ip_tunnel ip_send_check(iph); \ \ err = NF_HOOK(PF_INET, NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT, skb, NULL, rt->u.dst.dev, dst_output);\ - if (err == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || err == NET_XMIT_CN) { \ + if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) { \ stats->tx_bytes += pkt_len; \ stats->tx_packets++; \ } else { \ diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c index bc400b2ba2..61c09014da 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c @@ -501,8 +501,7 @@ static int dccp_v4_send_response(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, err = ip_build_and_send_pkt(skb, sk, ireq->loc_addr, ireq->rmt_addr, ireq->opt); - if (err == NET_XMIT_CN) - err = 0; + err = net_xmit_eval(err); } out: @@ -571,7 +570,7 @@ static void dccp_v4_ctl_send_reset(struct sk_buff *rxskb) rxskb->nh.iph->saddr, NULL); bh_unlock_sock(dccp_v4_ctl_socket->sk); - if (err == NET_XMIT_CN || err == 0) { + if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) { DCCP_INC_STATS_BH(DCCP_MIB_OUTSEGS); DCCP_INC_STATS_BH(DCCP_MIB_OUTRSTS); } diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c index 8d6ddb6389..2165b1740c 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c @@ -294,8 +294,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_send_response(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, &ireq6->rmt_addr); ipv6_addr_copy(&fl.fl6_dst, &ireq6->rmt_addr); err = ip6_xmit(sk, skb, &fl, opt, 0); - if (err == NET_XMIT_CN) - err = 0; + err = net_xmit_eval(err); } done: diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c index 0994b13f0f..ef22f3cc79 100644 --- a/net/dccp/output.c +++ b/net/dccp/output.c @@ -125,16 +125,7 @@ static int dccp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) memset(&(IPCB(skb)->opt), 0, sizeof(IPCB(skb)->opt)); err = icsk->icsk_af_ops->queue_xmit(skb, sk, 0); - if (err <= 0) - return err; - - /* NET_XMIT_CN is special. It does not guarantee, - * that this packet is lost. It tells that device - * is about to start to drop packets or already - * drops some packets of the same priority and - * invokes us to send less aggressively. - */ - return err == NET_XMIT_CN ? 0 : err; + return net_xmit_eval(err); } return -ENOBUFS; } @@ -426,8 +417,7 @@ int dccp_send_reset(struct sock *sk, enum dccp_reset_codes code) if (skb != NULL) { memset(&(IPCB(skb)->opt), 0, sizeof(IPCB(skb)->opt)); err = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->queue_xmit(skb, sk, 0); - if (err == NET_XMIT_CN) - err = 0; + return net_xmit_eval(err); } } diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c index 2eb5884440..0ad0904bf5 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c @@ -662,8 +662,7 @@ static int tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, err = ip_build_and_send_pkt(skb, sk, ireq->loc_addr, ireq->rmt_addr, ireq->opt); - if (err == NET_XMIT_CN) - err = 0; + err = net_xmit_eval(err); } out: diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c index f63e99aac2..6a8581ab9a 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c @@ -484,13 +484,7 @@ static int tcp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int clone_it, tcp_enter_cwr(sk); - /* NET_XMIT_CN is special. It does not guarantee, - * that this packet is lost. It tells that device - * is about to start to drop packets or already - * drops some packets of the same priority and - * invokes us to send less aggressively. - */ - return err == NET_XMIT_CN ? 0 : err; + return net_xmit_eval(err); #undef SYSCTL_FLAG_TSTAMPS #undef SYSCTL_FLAG_WSCALE diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c index 4919f9294e..80a1190915 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ ip6ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) err = NF_HOOK(PF_INET6, NF_IP6_LOCAL_OUT, skb, NULL, skb->dst->dev, dst_output); - if (err == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS || err == NET_XMIT_CN) { + if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) { stats->tx_bytes += pkt_len; stats->tx_packets++; } else { diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c index 9a8e690fdf..9a88395a76 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c @@ -502,8 +502,7 @@ static int tcp_v6_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req, ipv6_addr_copy(&fl.fl6_dst, &treq->rmt_addr); err = ip6_xmit(sk, skb, &fl, opt, 0); - if (err == NET_XMIT_CN) - err = 0; + err = net_xmit_eval(err); } done: -- 2.39.5