From b733c007edad6f3e05109951bacc6f87dd807917 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 02:23:38 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] [NET]: Clean proto_(un)register from in-code ifdefs The struct proto has the per-cpu "inuse" counter, which is handled with a special care. All the handling code hides under the ifdef CONFIG_SMP and it introduces some code duplication and makes it look worse than it could. Clean this. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/sock.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index e077f263b7..8fc2f84209 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -1819,23 +1819,48 @@ static int inuse_get(const struct proto *prot) res += per_cpu_ptr(prot->inuse_ptr, cpu)[0]; return res; } -#endif -int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab) +static int inuse_init(struct proto *prot) { - char *request_sock_slab_name = NULL; - char *timewait_sock_slab_name; - int rc = -ENOBUFS; - -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (!prot->inuse_getval || !prot->inuse_add) { prot->inuse_ptr = alloc_percpu(int); if (prot->inuse_ptr == NULL) - goto out; + return -ENOBUFS; + prot->inuse_getval = inuse_get; prot->inuse_add = inuse_add; } + return 0; +} + +static void inuse_fini(struct proto *prot) +{ + if (prot->inuse_ptr != NULL) { + free_percpu(prot->inuse_ptr); + prot->inuse_ptr = NULL; + prot->inuse_getval = NULL; + prot->inuse_add = NULL; + } +} +#else +static inline int inuse_init(struct proto *prot) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void inuse_fini(struct proto *prot) +{ +} #endif + +int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab) +{ + char *request_sock_slab_name = NULL; + char *timewait_sock_slab_name; + + if (inuse_init(prot)) + goto out; + if (alloc_slab) { prot->slab = kmem_cache_create(prot->name, prot->obj_size, 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL); @@ -1887,9 +1912,8 @@ int proto_register(struct proto *prot, int alloc_slab) write_lock(&proto_list_lock); list_add(&prot->node, &proto_list); write_unlock(&proto_list_lock); - rc = 0; -out: - return rc; + return 0; + out_free_timewait_sock_slab_name: kfree(timewait_sock_slab_name); out_free_request_sock_slab: @@ -1903,15 +1927,9 @@ out_free_sock_slab: kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab); prot->slab = NULL; out_free_inuse: -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - if (prot->inuse_ptr != NULL) { - free_percpu(prot->inuse_ptr); - prot->inuse_ptr = NULL; - prot->inuse_getval = NULL; - prot->inuse_add = NULL; - } -#endif - goto out; + inuse_fini(prot); +out: + return -ENOBUFS; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(proto_register); @@ -1922,14 +1940,7 @@ void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot) list_del(&prot->node); write_unlock(&proto_list_lock); -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - if (prot->inuse_ptr != NULL) { - free_percpu(prot->inuse_ptr); - prot->inuse_ptr = NULL; - prot->inuse_getval = NULL; - prot->inuse_add = NULL; - } -#endif + inuse_fini(prot); if (prot->slab != NULL) { kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab); prot->slab = NULL; -- 2.39.5