From 95425f19beed99cb9b0a79f69731eda907d9db99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerald Schaefer Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:39:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [S390] Initialize interval value to 0. sscanf() could leave the interval value unchanged in which case it would be used uninitialized. Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c index 45c9fa7d75..af1e8fc7d9 100644 --- a/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c +++ b/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ appldata_interval_handler(ctl_table *ctl, int write, struct file *filp, if (copy_from_user(buf, buffer, len > sizeof(buf) ? sizeof(buf) : len)) { return -EFAULT; } + interval = 0; sscanf(buf, "%i", &interval); if (interval <= 0) { P_ERROR("Timer CPU interval has to be > 0!\n"); -- 2.39.5