From 8c703d35fa91911dd92a18c31a718853f483ad80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:15:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] in_atomic(): document why it is unsuitable for general use Discourage people from inappropriately using in_atomic() Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/hardirq.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/hardirq.h b/include/linux/hardirq.h index 49829988bf..897f723bd2 100644 --- a/include/linux/hardirq.h +++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h @@ -72,6 +72,13 @@ #define in_softirq() (softirq_count()) #define in_interrupt() (irq_count()) +/* + * Are we running in atomic context? WARNING: this macro cannot + * always detect atomic context; in particular, it cannot know about + * held spinlocks in non-preemptible kernels. Thus it should not be + * used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible. + * Do not use in_atomic() in driver code. + */ #define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0) #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT -- 2.39.5