From 89e09f5ebba4bcde9852e4be4af536d5b691f20a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anton Blanchard Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:24:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] ppc64: remove -fno-omit-frame-pointer During some code inspection using gcc 4.0 I noticed a stack frame was being created for a number of functions that didnt require it. For example: c0000000000df944 <._spin_unlock>: c0000000000df944: fb e1 ff f0 std r31,-16(r1) c0000000000df948: f8 21 ff c1 stdu r1,-64(r1) c0000000000df94c: 7c 3f 0b 78 mr r31,r1 c0000000000df950: 7c 20 04 ac lwsync c0000000000df954: e8 21 00 00 ld r1,0(r1) c0000000000df958: 38 00 00 00 li r0,0 c0000000000df95c: 90 03 00 00 stw r0,0(r3) c0000000000df960: eb e1 ff f0 ld r31,-16(r1) c0000000000df964: 4e 80 00 20 blr It turns out we are adding -fno-omit-frame-pointer to ppc64 which is causing the above behaviour. Removing that flag results in much better code: c0000000000d5b30 <._spin_unlock>: c0000000000d5b30: 7c 20 04 ac lwsync c0000000000d5b34: 38 00 00 00 li r0,0 c0000000000d5b38: 90 03 00 00 stw r0,0(r3) c0000000000d5b3c: 4e 80 00 20 blr We dont require a frame pointer to debug on ppc64, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/ppc64/Kconfig | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ppc64/Kconfig b/arch/ppc64/Kconfig index 15c4a1455c..ef1f05e437 100644 --- a/arch/ppc64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/ppc64/Kconfig @@ -40,10 +40,6 @@ config COMPAT bool default y -config FRAME_POINTER - bool - default y - # We optimistically allocate largepages from the VM, so make the limit # large enough (16MB). This badly named config option is actually # max order + 1 -- 2.39.5