From 88d535b6b58632bc51ee9a1f35ddfc357e365c37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Baechle Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:18:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] One definition of back_to_back_c0_hazard too much. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle --- include/asm-mips/hazards.h | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-mips/hazards.h b/include/asm-mips/hazards.h index d6e88cf06b..181f08de88 100644 --- a/include/asm-mips/hazards.h +++ b/include/asm-mips/hazards.h @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ __asm__( " .endm \n\t"); #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_RM9000 + /* * RM9000 hazards. When the JTLB is updated by tlbwi or tlbwr, a subsequent * use of the JTLB for instructions should not occur for 4 cpu cycles and use @@ -144,12 +145,6 @@ __asm__( "nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop;\n\t" \ ".set reorder\n\t") -#define back_to_back_c0_hazard() \ - __asm__ __volatile__( \ - " .set noreorder \n" \ - " nop; nop; nop \n" \ - " .set reorder \n") - #endif /* -- 2.39.5