From 86d78f640257344cc90a50da8cd52297ba1c6bdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Beulich Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix watchdog ops for CoreDuo There apparently was an unnoticed conflict between an earlier patch to this file and mine (d1e084746b0e5806e6345ab31c5b370f8dee2b23), which I noticed only now. I suppose a change like the one below (untested) is needed; I didn't get any response on a confirmation request for this from the submitter of the first patch. The issue is the writing of the 'checkbit' member at the end of setup_intel_arch_watchdog(), which my patch made go to intel_arch_wd_ops rather than wd_ops. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c index b943e10ad8..f9ae93adff 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c @@ -614,16 +614,6 @@ static struct wd_ops intel_arch_wd_ops __read_mostly = { .evntsel = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL1, }; -static struct wd_ops coreduo_wd_ops = { - .reserve = single_msr_reserve, - .unreserve = single_msr_unreserve, - .setup = setup_intel_arch_watchdog, - .rearm = p6_rearm, - .stop = single_msr_stop_watchdog, - .perfctr = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0, - .evntsel = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0, -}; - static void probe_nmi_watchdog(void) { switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) { @@ -637,8 +627,8 @@ static void probe_nmi_watchdog(void) /* Work around Core Duo (Yonah) errata AE49 where perfctr1 doesn't have a working enable bit. */ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 14) { - wd_ops = &coreduo_wd_ops; - break; + intel_arch_wd_ops.perfctr = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0; + intel_arch_wd_ops.evntsel = MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0; } if (cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON)) { wd_ops = &intel_arch_wd_ops; -- 2.39.5