From 7c91767a6b701543c93ebcd611dab61deff3dad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Mishin Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 02:25:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [NET]: add_timer -> mod_timer() in dst_run_gc() Patch from Dmitry Mishin : Replace add_timer() by mod_timer() in dst_run_gc in order to avoid BUG message. CPU1 CPU2 dst_run_gc() entered dst_run_gc() entered spin_lock(&dst_lock) ..... del_timer(&dst_gc_timer) fail to get lock .... mod_timer() <--- puts timer back to the list add_timer(&dst_gc_timer) <--- BUG because timer is in list already. Found during OpenVZ internal testing. At first we thought that it is OpenVZ specific as we added dst_run_gc(0) call in dst_dev_event(), but as Alexey pointed to me it is possible to trigger this condition in mainstream kernel. F.e. timer has fired on CPU2, but the handler was preeempted by an irq before dst_lock is tried. Meanwhile, someone on CPU1 adds an entry to gc list and starts the timer. If CPU2 was preempted long enough, this timer can expire simultaneously with resuming timer handler on CPU1, arriving exactly to the situation described. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Mishin Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev Signed-off-by: Alexey Kuznetsov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/dst.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c index 470c05bc4c..1a5e49da0e 100644 --- a/net/core/dst.c +++ b/net/core/dst.c @@ -95,12 +95,11 @@ static void dst_run_gc(unsigned long dummy) dst_gc_timer_inc = DST_GC_INC; dst_gc_timer_expires = DST_GC_MIN; } - dst_gc_timer.expires = jiffies + dst_gc_timer_expires; #if RT_CACHE_DEBUG >= 2 printk("dst_total: %d/%d %ld\n", atomic_read(&dst_total), delayed, dst_gc_timer_expires); #endif - add_timer(&dst_gc_timer); + mod_timer(&dst_gc_timer, jiffies + dst_gc_timer_expires); out: spin_unlock(&dst_lock); -- 2.39.5