From 7a3e3e18e40848b6f01d44407ce86b91b8535fbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:03:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] NFS: Ensure that we respect NFS_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT It isn't sufficient just to limit timeout->to_initval, we also need to limit to_maxval. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/client.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c index 906613362a..59a6dccab5 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/client.c +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c @@ -387,12 +387,16 @@ static void nfs_init_timeout_values(struct rpc_timeout *to, int proto, switch (proto) { case XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP: case XPRT_TRANSPORT_RDMA: - if (!to->to_initval) + if (to->to_initval == 0) to->to_initval = 60 * HZ; if (to->to_initval > NFS_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT) to->to_initval = NFS_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT; to->to_increment = to->to_initval; to->to_maxval = to->to_initval + (to->to_increment * to->to_retries); + if (to->to_maxval > NFS_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT) + to->to_maxval = NFS_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT; + if (to->to_maxval < to->to_initval) + to->to_maxval = to->to_initval; to->to_exponential = 0; break; case XPRT_TRANSPORT_UDP: -- 2.39.5