From 52aed7cd52ce8a1d576e26976c3950512e1af8b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anton Blanchard Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 02:54:07 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Update MTFSF_L() comment David Woodhouse points out that the comment accompanying the MTFSF_L macro is misleading. We should make it clear that the L bit is ignored on older CPUS, not the entire instruction. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras --- include/asm-powerpc/reg.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h index 3a9fcc1581..8fb96811b5 100644 --- a/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/reg.h @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ /* * An mtfsf instruction with the L bit set. On CPUs that support this a - * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs it is ignored. + * full 64bits of FPSCR is restored and on other CPUs the L bit is ignored. * * Until binutils gets the new form of mtfsf, hardwire the instruction. */ -- 2.39.5