From 46d13a384bc695ec61458e5dcbac1eee6d623a9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Beulich Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:57:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] x86_64: use halt() instead of raw inline assembly Use abstractions whenever possible. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86_64/kernel/crash.c | 2 +- arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/crash.c index 4e6c3b729e..ec1c7431d5 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/crash.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/crash.c @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static int crash_nmi_callback(struct pt_regs *regs, int cpu) atomic_dec(&waiting_for_crash_ipi); /* Assume hlt works */ for(;;) - asm("hlt"); + halt(); return 1; } diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c index 4a6628b14d..fe906ba1cf 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static void smp_really_stop_cpu(void *dummy) { smp_stop_cpu(); for (;;) - asm("hlt"); + halt(); } void smp_send_stop(void) -- 2.39.5