From 3dd730f2b49f101b90d283c3efc4e6cd826dd8f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:07:37 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] cpumask: statement expressions confuse some versions of gcc when you take the address of the result. Noticed on a sparc64 compile using a version 3.4.5 cross compiler. kernel/time/tick-common.c: In function `tick_check_new_device': kernel/time/tick-common.c:210: error: invalid lvalue in unary `&' ... Just make it a regular expression. Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/cpumask.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h index 96d0509fb8..d3219d73f8 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static inline const cpumask_t *get_cpu_mask(unsigned int cpu) * gcc optimizes it out (it's a constant) and there's no huge stack * variable created: */ -#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) ({ *get_cpu_mask(cpu); }) +#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) (*get_cpu_mask(cpu)) #define CPU_MASK_LAST_WORD BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(NR_CPUS) -- 2.39.5