From 3d80ede4799889ede2aa785c2511aef3e78d5bb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Scott Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:57:30 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] [XFS] Drop use of m_writeio_blocks when zeroing, its not meaningful anymore here. SGI-PV: 904196 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26094a Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott --- fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c | 17 +++-------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c index 67b5e1c20d..6fbdca3eaa 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c @@ -510,7 +510,6 @@ xfs_zero_eof( xfs_fileoff_t end_zero_fsb; xfs_fileoff_t zero_count_fsb; xfs_fileoff_t last_fsb; - xfs_extlen_t buf_len_fsb; xfs_mount_t *mp = io->io_mount; int nimaps; int error = 0; @@ -579,16 +578,7 @@ xfs_zero_eof( } /* - * There are blocks in the range requested. - * Zero them a single write at a time. We actually - * don't zero the entire range returned if it is - * too big and simply loop around to get the rest. - * That is not the most efficient thing to do, but it - * is simple and this path should not be exercised often. - */ - buf_len_fsb = XFS_FILBLKS_MIN(imap.br_blockcount, - mp->m_writeio_blocks << 8); - /* + * There are blocks we need to zero. * Drop the inode lock while we're doing the I/O. * We'll still have the iolock to protect us. */ @@ -596,14 +586,13 @@ xfs_zero_eof( error = xfs_iozero(ip, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, start_zero_fsb), - XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, buf_len_fsb), + XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, imap.br_blockcount), end_size); - if (error) { goto out_lock; } - start_zero_fsb = imap.br_startoff + buf_len_fsb; + start_zero_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount; ASSERT(start_zero_fsb <= (end_zero_fsb + 1)); XFS_ILOCK(mp, io, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_EXTSIZE_RD); -- 2.39.5