From 39b8931b5cad9a7cbcd2394a40a088311e783a82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fenghua Yu Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:48:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: handle invalid ACPI SLIT table This is a SLIT sanity checking patch. It moves slit_valid() function to generic ACPI code and does sanity checking for both x86 and ia64. It sets up node_distance with LOCAL_DISTANCE and REMOTE_DISTANCE when hitting invalid SLIT table on ia64. It also cleans up unused variable localities in acpi_parse_slit() on x86. Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 9 +++++++-- arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 27 --------------------------- drivers/acpi/numa.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c index 853d1f11be..43687cc60d 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ void __init acpi_numa_slit_init(struct acpi_table_slit *slit) printk(KERN_ERR "ACPI 2.0 SLIT: size mismatch: %d expected, %d actual\n", len, slit->header.length); - memset(numa_slit, 10, sizeof(numa_slit)); return; } slit_table = slit; @@ -574,8 +573,14 @@ void __init acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void) printk(KERN_INFO "Number of memory chunks in system = %d\n", num_node_memblks); - if (!slit_table) + if (!slit_table) { + for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) + for (j = 0; j < MAX_NUMNODES; j++) + node_distance(i, j) = i == j ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : + REMOTE_DISTANCE; return; + } + memset(numa_slit, -1, sizeof(numa_slit)); for (i = 0; i < slit_table->locality_count; i++) { if (!pxm_bit_test(i)) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c index 3890234e5b..99649dccad 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c @@ -97,36 +97,9 @@ static __init inline int srat_disabled(void) return numa_off || acpi_numa < 0; } -/* - * A lot of BIOS fill in 10 (= no distance) everywhere. This messes - * up the NUMA heuristics which wants the local node to have a smaller - * distance than the others. - * Do some quick checks here and only use the SLIT if it passes. - */ -static __init int slit_valid(struct acpi_table_slit *slit) -{ - int i, j; - int d = slit->locality_count; - for (i = 0; i < d; i++) { - for (j = 0; j < d; j++) { - u8 val = slit->entry[d*i + j]; - if (i == j) { - if (val != LOCAL_DISTANCE) - return 0; - } else if (val <= LOCAL_DISTANCE) - return 0; - } - } - return 1; -} - /* Callback for SLIT parsing */ void __init acpi_numa_slit_init(struct acpi_table_slit *slit) { - if (!slit_valid(slit)) { - printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: SLIT table looks invalid. Not used.\n"); - return; - } acpi_slit = slit; } diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c index 5d59cb33b1..658e5f3aba 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c @@ -140,19 +140,42 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header) } } +/* + * A lot of BIOS fill in 10 (= no distance) everywhere. This messes + * up the NUMA heuristics which wants the local node to have a smaller + * distance than the others. + * Do some quick checks here and only use the SLIT if it passes. + */ +static __init int slit_valid(struct acpi_table_slit *slit) +{ + int i, j; + int d = slit->locality_count; + for (i = 0; i < d; i++) { + for (j = 0; j < d; j++) { + u8 val = slit->entry[d*i + j]; + if (i == j) { + if (val != LOCAL_DISTANCE) + return 0; + } else if (val <= LOCAL_DISTANCE) + return 0; + } + } + return 1; +} + static int __init acpi_parse_slit(struct acpi_table_header *table) { struct acpi_table_slit *slit; - u32 localities; if (!table) return -EINVAL; slit = (struct acpi_table_slit *)table; - /* downcast just for %llu vs %lu for i386/ia64 */ - localities = (u32) slit->locality_count; - + if (!slit_valid(slit)) { + printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: SLIT table looks invalid. Not used.\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } acpi_numa_slit_init(slit); return 0; -- 2.39.5