From 390c53430498c9973e015432806edd53b2efe6c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 21:08:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] spufs: add memory barriers after set_bit set_bit does not guarantee ordering on powerpc, so using it for communication between threads requires explicit mb() calls. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c index 405a0555d7..1582d76452 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ void spu_start_tick(struct spu_context *ctx) * Make sure the exiting bit is cleared. */ clear_bit(SPU_SCHED_EXITING, &ctx->sched_flags); + mb(); queue_delayed_work(spu_sched_wq, &ctx->sched_work, SPU_TIMESLICE); } } @@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ void spu_stop_tick(struct spu_context *ctx) * makes sure it does not rearm itself anymore. */ set_bit(SPU_SCHED_EXITING, &ctx->sched_flags); + mb(); cancel_delayed_work(&ctx->sched_work); } } @@ -239,6 +241,7 @@ static void spu_add_to_rq(struct spu_context *ctx) spin_lock(&spu_prio->runq_lock); list_add_tail(&ctx->rq, &spu_prio->runq[ctx->prio]); set_bit(ctx->prio, spu_prio->bitmap); + mb(); spin_unlock(&spu_prio->runq_lock); } -- 2.39.5