From 33e9fc7d01269737cd5a3b6de1db9d0e796ab708 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:53:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ptrace: ptrace_attach: use send_sig_info() instead
 force_sig_specific()

Nobody can block/ignore SIGSTOP, no need to use force_sig_specific() in
ptrace_attach.  Use the "regular" send_sig_info().

With this patch stracing of /sbin/init doesn't clear its SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE,
but not that this makes ptracing of init safe.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 kernel/ptrace.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index ce66d66881..5f8d452e81 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ repeat:
 
 	__ptrace_link(task, current);
 
-	force_sig_specific(SIGSTOP, task);
-
+	send_sig_info(SIGSTOP, SEND_SIG_FORCED, task);
 bad:
 	write_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
 	task_unlock(task);
-- 
2.39.5