From 0ee23b50f1541aacc3b975edae170a1b995b84f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesper Juhl Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 02:58:56 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] xtensa: use valid_signal() xtensa should use valid_signal() instead of testing _NSIG directly like everyone else. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl Cc: Chris Zankel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c index 9ef07a4dd2..2659efdd4e 100644 --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -239,7 +240,7 @@ int sys_ptrace(long request, long pid, long addr, long data) case PTRACE_CONT: /* restart after signal. */ { ret = -EIO; - if ((unsigned long) data > _NSIG) + if (!valid_signal(data)) break; if (request == PTRACE_SYSCALL) set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE); @@ -269,7 +270,7 @@ int sys_ptrace(long request, long pid, long addr, long data) case PTRACE_SINGLESTEP: ret = -EIO; - if ((unsigned long) data > _NSIG) + if (!valid_signal(data)) break; clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE); child->ptrace |= PT_SINGLESTEP; -- 2.39.5