Alan Jenkins [Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:32:16 +0000 (17:32 +0100)]
udevd: be more careful when matching against parents
I'm worried about what will happen with things like
KERNELS=="*" # pointless rule
KERNELS=="doesnt-match" # another pointless rule
Since TK_RULE < TK_M_PARENTS_MAX, we will try to match all three tokens
against parents of the current device. I can't think of a bad case,
but it's not exactly good either.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Alan Jenkins [Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:09:16 +0000 (16:09 +0000)]
udevd: fix termination of rule execution
LAST_RULE was broken, and I broke TK_END by making it do the same.
It used a "break" which exited the switch statement, but not the loop!
==2953== Invalid read of size 4
==2953== at 0x4081EE: dump_token (udev-rules.c:859)
==2953== by 0x40BADB: udev_rules_apply_to_event (udev-rules.c:1849)
==2953== by 0x403F17: udev_event_execute_rules (udev-event.c:554)
==2953== by 0x418626: main (test-udev.c:100)
==2953== Address 0x55ab1f8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 80 alloc'd
==2953== at 0x4C23082: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:429)
==2953== by 0x40B13B: udev_rules_new (udev-rules.c:1670)
==2953== by 0x418536: main (test-udev.c:84)
...
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Kay Sievers [Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:20:03 +0000 (09:20 +0100)]
rules: remove SCSI timeouts
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:55, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
The appropriate default timeout differs depending on the transport and
the type of the attached device, so the above two rules harm more than
help. The affect of the above two rules weren't visible for some
reason but with recent block layer timeout update, they actually work
and cause problems.
Alan Jenkins [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:01:21 +0000 (17:01 +0100)]
udevd: use a tighter loop for compare_devpath()
This crops up in my threaded udevd profiles from time to time.
It's not consistent - probably due to variations in the number
of concurrent events - but it can hit 4% user time and higher.
The change halves the user time spent in compare_devpath().
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
TEST 136: test multi matches 2
device '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/tty/ttyACM0' expecting node 'right'
==15011==
==15011== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1
==15011== at 0x47F9AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15011== by 0x489CB5F: strdup (in /lib32/libc-2.7.so)
==15011== by 0x8050F40: udev_rules_apply_to_event (udev-rules.c:1973)
==15011== by 0x804A658: udev_event_execute_rules (udev-event.c:549)
==15011== by 0x805A636: main (test-udev.c:100)
add: ok
==15012==
==15012== 7 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 1
==15012== at 0x47F1AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
==15012== by 0x4898B5F: strdup (in /lib32/libc-2.7.so)
==15012== by 0x8050F40: udev_rules_apply_to_event (udev-rules.c:1973)
==15012== by 0x804A9DF: udev_event_execute_rules (udev-event.c:658)
==15012== by 0x805A636: main (test-udev.c:100)
remove: ok
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Kay Sievers [Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:13:59 +0000 (00:13 +0200)]
replace in-memory rules array with match/action token list
The in-memory rule array of a common desktop distro install took: 1151088 bytes
with the token list:
109232 bytes tokens (6827 * 16 bytes), 71302 bytes buffer
Alan Jenkins [Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:39:04 +0000 (13:39 +0100)]
udevd: avoid overhead of calling rmdir on non-empty directories
Unfortunately the linux rmdir implementation unhashes the dentry
even when the directory is not removed. This is apparently by
design (for filesystems that don't allow deleting open files).
Results from time(1) and oprofile follow.
Before:
0.35user 0.90system
samples % image name symbol name
608 9.6738 vmlinux shrink_dcache_parent
293 4.6619 vmlinux copy_page_c
271 4.3119 vmlinux copy_page_range
257 4.0891 udevd udev_rules_iter_next
After:
0.31user 0.67system
samples % image name symbol name
361 5.0419 vmlinux copy_page_range
322 4.4972 udevd udev_rules_iter_next
300 4.1899 vmlinux copy_page_c
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>