From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 04:41:12 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: [PATCH] um: fix confusion irq early reenabling
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.21-rc4~92
X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ec0ac8ad33189f81324948ee5dc72d3e1dc64682;p=linux-2.6

[PATCH] um: fix confusion irq early reenabling

Fix confusion about call context - comments and code are inconsistent and
plain wrong, my fault.

Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Acked-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
index 01d4ab6b0e..f75d7b05c4 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
+++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
@@ -370,10 +370,10 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
 	struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
 	int err;
 
-	/* Interrupts are enabled here because we registered the interrupt with
+	/* Interrupts are disabled here because we registered the interrupt with
 	 * IRQF_DISABLED (see line_setup_irq).*/
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&line->lock);
+	spin_lock(&line->lock);
 	err = flush_buffer(line);
 	if (err == 0) {
 		return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
 		line->head = line->buffer;
 		line->tail = line->buffer;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&line->lock);
+	spin_unlock(&line->lock);
 
 	if(tty == NULL)
 		return IRQ_NONE;