From: Russell King Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:54:50 +0000 (+0100) Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Remove global nwfpe register variable X-Git-Tag: v2.6.13-rc4~80^2~5 X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b66da4a4859b0be3f12575863bf1d873116d1947;p=linux-2.6 [PATCH] ARM: Remove global nwfpe register variable Recent changes to nwfpe broke the build with some gcc versions: In file included from arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.c:33: arch/arm/nwfpe/fpa11.h:32: global register variable follows a function definition make[1]: *** [arch/arm/nwfpe/softfloat.o] Error 1 Since we now ensure that the kernel stack is empty when returning to user space, we can now access the userspace registers with reference to the kernel stack using current_thread_info(), rather than remembering the stack pointer at the time nwfpe was called. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpa11.h b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpa11.h index 45cc65426a..e4a61aea53 100644 --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpa11.h +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpa11.h @@ -29,9 +29,7 @@ * stack+task struct. Use the same method as 'current' uses to * reach them. */ -register unsigned long *user_registers asm("sl"); - -#define GET_USERREG() (user_registers) +#define GET_USERREG() ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_START_SP + (unsigned long)current_thread_info()) - 1) #include #include diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c index a8efcf3488..12885f31d3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ void float_raise(signed char flags) printk(KERN_DEBUG "NWFPE: %s[%d] takes exception %08x at %p from %08lx\n", current->comm, current->pid, flags, - __builtin_return_address(0), GET_USERREG()[15]); + __builtin_return_address(0), GET_USERREG()->ARM_pc); #endif /* Keep SoftFloat exception flags up to date. */ diff --git a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.inl b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.inl index e5f59e9a30..2c39ad408f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.inl +++ b/arch/arm/nwfpe/fpmodule.inl @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ static inline unsigned long readRegister(const unsigned int nReg) for this in this routine. LDF/STF instructions with Rn = PC depend on the PC being correct, as they use PC+8 in their address calculations. */ - unsigned long *userRegisters = GET_USERREG(); - unsigned int val = userRegisters[nReg]; + struct pt_regs *regs = GET_USERREG(); + unsigned int val = regs->uregs[nReg]; if (REG_PC == nReg) val -= 4; return val; @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ static inline unsigned long readRegister(const unsigned int nReg) static inline void writeRegister(const unsigned int nReg, const unsigned long val) { - unsigned long *userRegisters = GET_USERREG(); - userRegisters[nReg] = val; + struct pt_regs *regs = GET_USERREG(); + regs->uregs[nReg] = val; } static inline unsigned long readCPSR(void) @@ -63,12 +63,12 @@ static inline unsigned long readConditionCodes(void) static inline void writeConditionCodes(const unsigned long val) { - unsigned long *userRegisters = GET_USERREG(); + struct pt_regs *regs = GET_USERREG(); unsigned long rval; /* * Operate directly on userRegisters since * the CPSR may be the PC register itself. */ - rval = userRegisters[REG_CPSR] & ~CC_MASK; - userRegisters[REG_CPSR] = rval | (val & CC_MASK); + rval = regs->ARM_cpsr & ~CC_MASK; + regs->ARM_cpsr = rval | (val & CC_MASK); }