From: Russell King Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:08:56 +0000 (+0100) Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Move PGD kernel page table initialisation X-Git-Tag: v2.6.13-rc1~51^2~39^2~5 X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a343e6075a396e07eeff52c0da5629c8fd396be2;p=linux-2.6 [PATCH] ARM: Move PGD kernel page table initialisation It doesn't make sense to have the PGD kernel pointers initialisation separate from the PGD user pointers, especially when we clean the data cache over the whole range. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c index 2c2b93d77d..d79864a0df 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c @@ -169,7 +169,14 @@ pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(struct mm_struct *mm) memzero(new_pgd, FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR * sizeof(pgd_t)); + /* + * Copy over the kernel and IO PGD entries + */ init_pgd = pgd_offset_k(0); + memcpy(new_pgd + FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR, init_pgd + FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR, + (PTRS_PER_PGD - FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR) * sizeof(pgd_t)); + + clean_dcache_area(new_pgd, PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t)); if (!vectors_high()) { /* @@ -198,14 +205,6 @@ pgd_t *get_pgd_slow(struct mm_struct *mm) spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); } - /* - * Copy over the kernel and IO PGD entries - */ - memcpy(new_pgd + FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR, init_pgd + FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR, - (PTRS_PER_PGD - FIRST_KERNEL_PGD_NR) * sizeof(pgd_t)); - - clean_dcache_area(new_pgd, PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t)); - return new_pgd; no_pte: