From: J. Bruce Fields Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:11:27 +0000 (-0500) Subject: nfsd4: kill some unneeded setclientid comments X-Git-Tag: v2.6.25-rc1~1072^2~74 X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a186e767473bd329122f0229b91573b9b6fa43c1;p=linux-2.6 nfsd4: kill some unneeded setclientid comments Most of these comments just summarize the code. The matching of code to the cases described in the RFC may still be useful, though; add specific section references to make that easier to follow. Also update references to the outdated RFC 3010. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 9d81c7117a..242fee7c10 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -683,39 +683,6 @@ out_err: return; } -/* - * RFC 3010 has a complex implmentation description of processing a - * SETCLIENTID request consisting of 5 bullets, labeled as - * CASE0 - CASE4 below. - * - * NOTES: - * callback information will be processed in a future patch - * - * an unconfirmed record is added when: - * NORMAL (part of CASE 4): there is no confirmed nor unconfirmed record. - * CASE 1: confirmed record found with matching name, principal, - * verifier, and clientid. - * CASE 2: confirmed record found with matching name, principal, - * and there is no unconfirmed record with matching - * name and principal - * - * an unconfirmed record is replaced when: - * CASE 3: confirmed record found with matching name, principal, - * and an unconfirmed record is found with matching - * name, principal, and with clientid and - * confirm that does not match the confirmed record. - * CASE 4: there is no confirmed record with matching name and - * principal. there is an unconfirmed record with - * matching name, principal. - * - * an unconfirmed record is deleted when: - * CASE 1: an unconfirmed record that matches input name, verifier, - * and confirmed clientid. - * CASE 4: any unconfirmed records with matching name and principal - * that exist after an unconfirmed record has been replaced - * as described above. - * - */ __be32 nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct nfsd4_setclientid *setclid) @@ -748,11 +715,7 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, nfs4_lock_state(); conf = find_confirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval); if (conf) { - /* - * CASE 0: - * clname match, confirmed, different principal - * or different ip_address - */ + /* RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 0: */ status = nfserr_clid_inuse; if (!same_creds(&conf->cl_cred, &rqstp->rq_cred) || conf->cl_addr != sin->sin_addr.s_addr) { @@ -761,12 +724,17 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, goto out; } } + /* + * section 14.2.33 of RFC 3530 (under the heading "IMPLEMENTATION") + * has a description of SETCLIENTID request processing consisting + * of 5 bullet points, labeled as CASE0 - CASE4 below. + */ unconf = find_unconfirmed_client_by_str(dname, strhashval); status = nfserr_resource; if (!conf) { - /* - * CASE 4: - * placed first, because it is the normal case. + /* + * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 4: + * placed first, because it is the normal case */ if (unconf) expire_client(unconf); @@ -776,17 +744,8 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, gen_clid(new); } else if (same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &clverifier)) { /* - * CASE 1: - * cl_name match, confirmed, principal match - * verifier match: probable callback update - * - * remove any unconfirmed nfs4_client with - * matching cl_name, cl_verifier, and cl_clientid - * - * create and insert an unconfirmed nfs4_client with same - * cl_name, cl_verifier, and cl_clientid as existing - * nfs4_client, but with the new callback info and a - * new cl_confirm + * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 1: + * probable callback update */ if (unconf) { /* Note this is removing unconfirmed {*x***}, @@ -802,32 +761,19 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, copy_clid(new, conf); } else if (!unconf) { /* - * CASE 2: - * clname match, confirmed, principal match - * verfier does not match - * no unconfirmed. create a new unconfirmed nfs4_client - * using input clverifier, clname, and callback info - * and generate a new cl_clientid and cl_confirm. + * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 2: + * probable client reboot; state will be removed if + * confirmed. */ new = create_client(clname, dname); if (new == NULL) goto out; gen_clid(new); } else if (!same_verf(&conf->cl_confirm, &unconf->cl_confirm)) { - /* - * CASE3: - * confirmed found (name, principal match) - * confirmed verifier does not match input clverifier - * - * unconfirmed found (name match) - * confirmed->cl_confirm != unconfirmed->cl_confirm - * - * remove unconfirmed. - * - * create an unconfirmed nfs4_client - * with same cl_name as existing confirmed nfs4_client, - * but with new callback info, new cl_clientid, - * new cl_verifier and a new cl_confirm + /* + * RFC 3530 14.2.33 CASE 3: + * probable client reboot; state will be removed if + * confirmed. */ expire_client(unconf); new = create_client(clname, dname); @@ -857,11 +803,9 @@ out: /* - * RFC 3010 has a complex implmentation description of processing a - * SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM request consisting of 4 bullets describing - * processing on a DRC miss, labeled as CASE1 - CASE4 below. - * - * NOTE: callback information will be processed here in a future patch + * Section 14.2.34 of RFC 3530 (under the heading "IMPLEMENTATION") has + * a description of SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM request processing consisting of 4 + * bullets, labeled as CASE1 - CASE4 below. */ __be32 nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, @@ -892,16 +836,20 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, if (unconf && unconf->cl_addr != sin->sin_addr.s_addr) goto out; + /* + * section 14.2.34 of RFC 3530 has a description of + * SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM request processing consisting + * of 4 bullet points, labeled as CASE1 - CASE4 below. + */ if ((conf && unconf) && (same_verf(&unconf->cl_confirm, &confirm)) && (same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &unconf->cl_verifier)) && (same_name(conf->cl_recdir,unconf->cl_recdir)) && (!same_verf(&conf->cl_confirm, &unconf->cl_confirm))) { - /* CASE 1: - * unconf record that matches input clientid and input confirm. - * conf record that matches input clientid. - * conf and unconf records match names, verifiers - */ + /* + * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 1: + * callback update + */ if (!same_creds(&conf->cl_cred, &unconf->cl_cred)) status = nfserr_clid_inuse; else { @@ -918,11 +866,10 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, ((conf && unconf) && (!same_verf(&conf->cl_verifier, &unconf->cl_verifier) || !same_name(conf->cl_recdir, unconf->cl_recdir)))) { - /* CASE 2: - * conf record that matches input clientid. - * if unconf record matches input clientid, then - * unconf->cl_name or unconf->cl_verifier don't match the - * conf record. + /* + * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 2: + * probable retransmitted request; play it safe and + * do nothing. */ if (!same_creds(&conf->cl_cred, &rqstp->rq_cred)) status = nfserr_clid_inuse; @@ -930,10 +877,9 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, status = nfs_ok; } else if (!conf && unconf && same_verf(&unconf->cl_confirm, &confirm)) { - /* CASE 3: - * conf record not found. - * unconf record found. - * unconf->cl_confirm matches input confirm + /* + * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 3: + * Normal case; new or rebooted client: */ if (!same_creds(&unconf->cl_cred, &rqstp->rq_cred)) { status = nfserr_clid_inuse; @@ -954,11 +900,9 @@ nfsd4_setclientid_confirm(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, } else if ((!conf || (conf && !same_verf(&conf->cl_confirm, &confirm))) && (!unconf || (unconf && !same_verf(&unconf->cl_confirm, &confirm)))) { - /* CASE 4: - * conf record not found, or if conf, conf->cl_confirm does not - * match input confirm. - * unconf record not found, or if unconf, unconf->cl_confirm - * does not match input confirm. + /* + * RFC 3530 14.2.34 CASE 4: + * Client probably hasn't noticed that we rebooted yet. */ status = nfserr_stale_clientid; } else {