From: Andi Kleen Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 01:14:00 +0000 (+0100) Subject: [PATCH] x86-64: Don't keep interrupts disabled while spinning in spinlocks X-Git-Tag: v2.6.20-rc1~145^2^2~8^2~148 X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=87e1652c7863b9ae406ff37f33c7ec2bb494d7b1;p=linux-2.6 [PATCH] x86-64: Don't keep interrupts disabled while spinning in spinlocks Follows i386. Based on patch from some folks at Google (MikeW, Edward G.?), but completely redone by AK. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen --- diff --git a/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h b/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h index 05ef097ba5..88bf981e73 100644 --- a/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h +++ b/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h @@ -36,7 +36,34 @@ static inline void __raw_spin_lock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) "2:\t" : "=m" (lock->slock) : : "memory"); } -#define __raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) __raw_spin_lock(lock) +/* + * Same as __raw_spin_lock, but reenable interrupts during spinning. + */ +#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING +static inline void __raw_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags) +{ + asm volatile( + "\n1:\t" + LOCK_PREFIX " ; decl %0\n\t" + "jns 5f\n" + "testl $0x200, %1\n\t" /* interrupts were disabled? */ + "jz 4f\n\t" + "sti\n" + "3:\t" + "rep;nop\n\t" + "cmpl $0, %0\n\t" + "jle 3b\n\t" + "cli\n\t" + "jmp 1b\n" + "4:\t" + "rep;nop\n\t" + "cmpl $0, %0\n\t" + "jg 1b\n\t" + "jmp 4b\n" + "5:\n\t" + : "+m" (lock->slock) : "r" ((unsigned)flags) : "memory"); +} +#endif static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) {