From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:45:01 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: [PATCH] more nameidata removal: exec_permission_lite() doesn't need it
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.27-rc1~73^2~20
X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=672b16b2f66c149888bd876a4f92342112205fe1;p=linux-2.6

[PATCH] more nameidata removal: exec_permission_lite() doesn't need it

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 6b0e8e5e07..6d75430358 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -460,8 +460,7 @@ static struct dentry * cached_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name,
  * short-cut DAC fails, then call permission() to do more
  * complete permission check.
  */
-static int exec_permission_lite(struct inode *inode,
-				       struct nameidata *nd)
+static int exec_permission_lite(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	umode_t	mode = inode->i_mode;
 
@@ -884,7 +883,7 @@ static int __link_path_walk(const char *name, struct nameidata *nd)
 		unsigned int c;
 
 		nd->flags |= LOOKUP_CONTINUE;
-		err = exec_permission_lite(inode, nd);
+		err = exec_permission_lite(inode);
 		if (err == -EAGAIN)
 			err = vfs_permission(nd, MAY_EXEC);
  		if (err)