From: Kurt Garloff Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:16:48 +0000 (+0200) Subject: [SCSI] Try LUN 1 and use bflags X-Git-Tag: v2.6.18-rc1~1092^2~86 X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4186ab1973758190916703eb8889ebe8002c5c8f;p=linux-2.6 [SCSI] Try LUN 1 and use bflags Some devices report a peripheral qualifier of 3 for LUN 0; with the original code, we would still try a REPORT_LUNS scan (if SCSI level is >= 3 or if we have the BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 passed in), but NOT any sequential scan. Also, the device at LUN 0 (which is not connected according to the PQ) is not registered with the OS. Unfortunately, SANs exist that are SCSI-2 and do NOT support REPORT_LUNS, but report a unknown device with PQ 3 on LUN 0. We still need to scan them, and most probably we even need BLIST_SPARSELUN (and BLIST_LARGELUN). See the bug reference for an infamous example. This is patch 1/3: If we end up in sequential scan, at least try LUN 1 for devices that reported a PQ of 3 for LUN 0. Also return blacklist flags, even for PQ3 devices. Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c index f14945996e..820c4ad7b5 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c @@ -872,6 +872,8 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget, if (scsi_probe_lun(sdev, result, result_len, &bflags)) goto out_free_result; + if (bflagsp) + *bflagsp = bflags; /* * result contains valid SCSI INQUIRY data. */ @@ -912,8 +914,6 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget, sdev->lockable = 0; scsi_unlock_floptical(sdev, result); } - if (bflagsp) - *bflagsp = bflags; } out_free_result: @@ -938,7 +938,6 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget, * scsi_sequential_lun_scan - sequentially scan a SCSI target * @starget: pointer to target structure to scan * @bflags: black/white list flag for LUN 0 - * @lun0_res: result of scanning LUN 0 * * Description: * Generally, scan from LUN 1 (LUN 0 is assumed to already have been @@ -948,8 +947,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget, * Modifies sdevscan->lun. **/ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(struct scsi_target *starget, - int bflags, int lun0_res, int scsi_level, - int rescan) + int bflags, int scsi_level, int rescan) { unsigned int sparse_lun, lun, max_dev_lun; struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent); @@ -969,13 +967,6 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(struct scsi_target *starget, } else sparse_lun = 0; - /* - * If not sparse lun and no device attached at LUN 0 do not scan - * any further. - */ - if (!sparse_lun && (lun0_res != SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT)) - return; - /* * If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop * scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug @@ -1384,7 +1375,7 @@ static void __scsi_scan_target(struct device *parent, unsigned int channel, * do a sequential scan. */ scsi_sequential_lun_scan(starget, bflags, - res, starget->scsi_level, rescan); + starget->scsi_level, rescan); } out_reap: