From: Eric W. Biederman Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 07:26:53 +0000 (-0700) Subject: tty: simplify calling of put_pid. X-Git-Tag: v2.6.22-rc1~726 X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2a65f1d9fe78475720bd8f0e0fbbf1973b1b5ac2;p=linux-2.6 tty: simplify calling of put_pid. This patch should contain no functional changes. At some point I got confused and thought put_pid could not be called while a spin lock was held. While it may be nice to avoid that to reduce lock hold times put_pid can be safely called while we hold a spin lock. This patch removes all of the complications from the code introduced by my misunderstanding, making the code a little more readable. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c index a7b915516d..39db186d5c 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c +++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c @@ -153,8 +153,7 @@ int tty_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file * file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); static int tty_fasync(int fd, struct file * filp, int on); static void release_tty(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx); -static struct pid *__proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, - struct tty_struct *tty); +static void __proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty); /** * alloc_tty_struct - allocate a tty object @@ -1532,10 +1531,9 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit) } spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - tty_pgrp = current->signal->tty_old_pgrp; + put_pid(current->signal->tty_old_pgrp); current->signal->tty_old_pgrp = NULL; spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - put_pid(tty_pgrp); mutex_lock(&tty_mutex); /* It is possible that do_tty_hangup has free'd this tty */ @@ -2506,7 +2504,6 @@ static int tty_open(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp) int index; dev_t device = inode->i_rdev; unsigned short saved_flags = filp->f_flags; - struct pid *old_pgrp; nonseekable_open(inode, filp); @@ -2600,17 +2597,15 @@ got_driver: goto retry_open; } - old_pgrp = NULL; mutex_lock(&tty_mutex); spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); if (!noctty && current->signal->leader && !current->signal->tty && tty->session == NULL) - old_pgrp = __proc_set_tty(current, tty); + __proc_set_tty(current, tty); spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex); - put_pid(old_pgrp); return 0; } @@ -3835,9 +3830,8 @@ void proc_clear_tty(struct task_struct *p) spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock); } -static struct pid *__proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty) +static void __proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty) { - struct pid *old_pgrp; if (tty) { /* We should not have a session or pgrp to here but.... */ put_pid(tty->session); @@ -3845,21 +3839,16 @@ static struct pid *__proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tt tty->session = get_pid(task_session(tsk)); tty->pgrp = get_pid(task_pgrp(tsk)); } - old_pgrp = tsk->signal->tty_old_pgrp; + put_pid(tsk->signal->tty_old_pgrp); tsk->signal->tty = tty; tsk->signal->tty_old_pgrp = NULL; - return old_pgrp; } void proc_set_tty(struct task_struct *tsk, struct tty_struct *tty) { - struct pid *old_pgrp; - spin_lock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock); - old_pgrp = __proc_set_tty(tsk, tty); + __proc_set_tty(tsk, tty); spin_unlock_irq(&tsk->sighand->siglock); - - put_pid(old_pgrp); } struct tty_struct *get_current_tty(void)