From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:54:00 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: [PATCH] tty: fix TCSBRK comment
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.18-rc1~551
X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=283fef59d6e934e8da11631446ea8e2e93fce14c;p=linux-2.6

[PATCH] tty: fix TCSBRK comment

Fix TCSBRK comment to prevent confusion or accidental removal.

Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
index 8b2a599698..bd74e82d8a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -2621,10 +2621,9 @@ int tty_ioctl(struct inode * inode, struct file * file,
 			tty->driver->break_ctl(tty, 0);
 			return 0;
 		case TCSBRK:   /* SVID version: non-zero arg --> no break */
-			/*
-			 * XXX is the above comment correct, or the
-			 * code below correct?  Is this ioctl used at
-			 * all by anyone?
+			/* non-zero arg means wait for all output data
+			 * to be sent (performed above) but don't send break.
+			 * This is used by the tcdrain() termios function.
 			 */
 			if (!arg)
 				return send_break(tty, 250);