From: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:22:25 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: [PATCH] ARM SMP: __xchg support
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.13-rc2~63^2~10^2
X-Git-Url: https://err.no/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=053a7b5b7617a72d7c61b6f84196d1c0f79b9849;p=linux-2.6

[PATCH] ARM SMP: __xchg support

This enables the existing __xchg implementation to be used on SMP.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---

diff --git a/include/asm-arm/system.h b/include/asm-arm/system.h
index 3d0d2860b6..cdf49f442f 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/system.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/system.h
@@ -290,7 +290,6 @@ do {									\
 })
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#error SMP not supported
 
 #define smp_mb()		mb()
 #define smp_rmb()		rmb()
@@ -304,6 +303,8 @@ do {									\
 #define smp_wmb()		barrier()
 #define smp_read_barrier_depends()		do { } while(0)
 
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_SA110)
 /*
  * On the StrongARM, "swp" is terminally broken since it bypasses the
@@ -316,9 +317,16 @@ do {									\
  *
  * We choose (1) since its the "easiest" to achieve here and is not
  * dependent on the processor type.
+ *
+ * NOTE that this solution won't work on an SMP system, so explcitly
+ * forbid it here.
  */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#error SMP is not supported on SA1100/SA110
+#else
 #define swp_is_buggy
 #endif
+#endif
 
 static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size)
 {
@@ -361,8 +369,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #define arch_align_stack(x) (x)