]> err.no Git - linux-2.6/commitdiff
[PATCH] uml: SIGWINCH handling cleanup
authorJeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:19:01 +0000 (00:19 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:33:47 +0000 (08:33 -0800)
Code cleanup - unregister_winch and winch_cleanup had some duplicate code.
This is now abstracted out into free_winch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
arch/um/drivers/line.c

index a3c39373adb9924e29f18c2feaadec503e2dba32..46ceb25a9959e18f235aba63b7b05a2304c33e06 100644 (file)
@@ -774,55 +774,49 @@ void register_winch_irq(int fd, int tty_fd, int pid, struct tty_struct *tty)
                printk("register_winch_irq - failed to register IRQ\n");
 }
 
+static void free_winch(struct winch *winch)
+{
+       list_del(&winch->list);
+
+       if(winch->pid != -1)
+               os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
+       if(winch->fd != -1)
+               os_close_file(winch->fd);
+
+       free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
+       kfree(winch);
+}
+
 static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
        struct list_head *ele;
-       struct winch *winch, *found = NULL;
+       struct winch *winch;
 
        spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
+
        list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
                winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
                 if(winch->tty == tty){
-                        found = winch;
-                        break;
+                       free_winch(winch);
+                       break;
                 }
         }
-        if(found == NULL)
-               goto err;
-
-       list_del(&winch->list);
-       spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
-
-        if(winch->pid != -1)
-                os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
-
-        free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch);
-        kfree(winch);
-
-       return;
-err:
        spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
 }
 
-/* XXX: No lock as it's an exitcall... is this valid? Depending on cleanup
- * order... are we sure that nothing else is done on the list? */
 static void winch_cleanup(void)
 {
-       struct list_head *ele;
+       struct list_head *ele, *next;
        struct winch *winch;
 
-       list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){
+       spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock);
+
+       list_for_each_safe(ele, next, &winch_handlers){
                winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list);
-               if(winch->fd != -1){
-                       /* Why is this different from the above free_irq(),
-                        * which deactivates SIGIO? This searches the FD
-                        * somewhere else and removes it from the list... */
-                       deactivate_fd(winch->fd, WINCH_IRQ);
-                       os_close_file(winch->fd);
-               }
-               if(winch->pid != -1)
-                       os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1);
+               free_winch(winch);
        }
+
+       spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
 }
 __uml_exitcall(winch_cleanup);