devices claim the same name, the link always points to the device with
the highest link_priority. If the current device goes away, the links are
re-evaluated and the device with the next highest link_priority becomes the owner of
- the link. If no link_priority is specified, the order of the devices, and
- which one of them owns the link, is undefined. Claiming the same name for
- a symlink, which is or might be used for a device node, may result in
- unexpected behavior and is not supported.
+ the link. If no link_priority is specified, the order of the devices (and
+ which one of them owns the link) is undefined. Also, symlink names must
+ never conflict with the kernel's default device node names, as that would
+ result in unpredictable behavior.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>