[XFRM]: Fix missing protocol comparison of larval SAs.

I noticed that in xfrm_state_add we look for the larval SA in a few
places without checking for protocol match. So when using both
AH and ESP, whichever one gets added first, deletes the larval SA.
It seems AH always gets added first and ESP is always the larval
SA's protocol since the xfrm->tmpl has it first. Thus causing the
additional km_query()

Adding the check eliminates accidental double SA creation.

Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index a35f9e4ede2674625b13191a9fd58736e81cbe91..5c5f6dcab974d954ce3940bb8e8b46071b4cd1c8 100644 (file)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ static struct xfrm_state *__find_acq_core(unsigned short family, u8 mode, u32 re
                    x->props.mode   != mode ||
                    x->props.family != family ||
                    x->km.state     != XFRM_STATE_ACQ ||
-                   x->id.spi       != 0)
+                   x->id.spi       != 0 ||
+                   x->id.proto     != proto)
                        continue;
 
                switch (family) {
@@ -801,7 +802,8 @@ int xfrm_state_add(struct xfrm_state *x)
 
        if (use_spi && x->km.seq) {
                x1 = __xfrm_find_acq_byseq(x->km.seq);
-               if (x1 && xfrm_addr_cmp(&x1->id.daddr, &x->id.daddr, family)) {
+               if (x1 && ((x1->id.proto != x->id.proto) ||
+                   xfrm_addr_cmp(&x1->id.daddr, &x->id.daddr, family))) {
                        xfrm_state_put(x1);
                        x1 = NULL;
                }