[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression

Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
index f37584015324ac54b3471351dc4964170c467204..dc9817cfb882a87f6b640640aeb243988e059c3d 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
 {
        struct cpufreq_policy policy;
        if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
-               return -ENODEV;
-       return 0;
+               return 0;
+       return 1;
 }
 
 static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)