Currently we never call unregister_netdev for the loopback device so
it is impossible for us to reach inetdev_destroy with the loopback
device. So the test in inetdev_destroy is unnecessary.
Further when testing with my network namespace patches removing
unregistering the loopback device and calling inetdev_destroy works
fine so there appears to be no reason for avoiding unregistering the
loopback device.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ASSERT_RTNL();
dev = in_dev->dev;
- if (dev == loopback_dev)
- return;
in_dev->dead = 1;