<tomegun> kay: is this a valid issue: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27060 ?
<kay> tomegun: udev does not really care if that fails
<tomegun> kay: the suggestion there is to treat EINVAL the same way we treat ENOTTY (i.e. as an info only)
<tomegun> if it really does not matter it might make sense to avoid bogus bug reports
<kay> tomegun: done
} else {
/* If this fails, then try HDIO_GET_IDENTITY */
if (ioctl(fd, HDIO_GET_IDENTITY, &id) != 0) {
- if (errno == ENOTTY) {
- info(udev, "HDIO_GET_IDENTITY unsupported for '%s'\n", node);
- rc = 2;
- } else {
- err(udev, "HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for '%s': %m\n", node);
- rc = 3;
- }
+ info(udev, "HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for '%s': %m\n", node);
+ rc = 2;
goto close;
}
}