[PATCH] md: fix minor error in raid10 read-balancing calculation.

'this_sector' is a virtual (array) address while 'head_position' is a physical
(device) address, so substraction doesn't make any sense.  devs[slot].addr
should be used instead of this_sector.

However, this patch doesn't make much practical different to the read
balancing due to the effects of later code.

Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index 62ebb1bc72be24cc32ecc775c5bd71603d44e5c6..7239079203ec1aa6652ddda6b990b4adf5cf0064 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -538,7 +538,8 @@ static int read_balance(conf_t *conf, r10bio_t *r10_bio)
        }
 
 
-       current_distance = abs(this_sector - conf->mirrors[disk].head_position);
+       current_distance = abs(r10_bio->devs[slot].addr -
+                              conf->mirrors[disk].head_position);
 
        /* Find the disk whose head is closest */