use of explicit labels in inline asm is a Bad Idea(tm), since gcc can
decide to inline the function in several places. Fixed by use of 1f/f:
instead of .Lfitsin/.Lfitsin:
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
"lra 3,0(%4)\n"
"lr 5,%5\n"
"diag 2,4,0x8\n"
- "brc 8, .Litfits\n"
+ "brc 8, 1f\n"
"ar 5, %5\n"
- ".Litfits: \n"
+ "1: \n"
"lr %0,4\n"
"lr %1,5\n"
: "=d" (return_code), "=d" (return_len)
"sam31\n"
"diag 2,4,0x8\n"
"sam64\n"
- "brc 8, .Litfits\n"
+ "brc 8, 1f\n"
"agr 5, %5\n"
- ".Litfits: \n"
+ "1: \n"
"lgr %0,4\n"
"lgr %1,5\n"
: "=d" (return_code), "=d" (return_len)