I think register ranges obviously need to be claimed/released for all UARTs
including those with UPIO_MEM32 and UPIO_TSI iotype.
Also, serial8250_request_rsa_resources() returns false positives with
UPIO_MEM32, UPIO_AU, and UPIO_TSI iotype -- I don't think this makes any sense.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
case UPIO_AU:
size = 0x100000;
/* fall thru */
+ case UPIO_TSI:
+ case UPIO_MEM32:
case UPIO_MEM:
if (!up->port.mapbase)
break;
case UPIO_AU:
size = 0x100000;
/* fall thru */
+ case UPIO_TSI:
+ case UPIO_MEM32:
case UPIO_MEM:
if (!up->port.mapbase)
break;
{
unsigned long start = UART_RSA_BASE << up->port.regshift;
unsigned int size = 8 << up->port.regshift;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
switch (up->port.iotype) {
- case UPIO_MEM:
- ret = -EINVAL;
- break;
-
case UPIO_HUB6:
case UPIO_PORT:
start += up->port.iobase;
- if (!request_region(start, size, "serial-rsa"))
+ if (request_region(start, size, "serial-rsa"))
+ ret = 0;
+ else
ret = -EBUSY;
break;
}
unsigned int size = 8 << up->port.regshift;
switch (up->port.iotype) {
- case UPIO_MEM:
- break;
-
case UPIO_HUB6:
case UPIO_PORT:
release_region(up->port.iobase + offset, size);