if (...) BUG(); should be replaced with BUG_ON(...) when the test has no
side-effects to allow a definition of BUG_ON that drops the code completely.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@ disable unlikely @ expression E,f; @@
(
if (<... f(...) ...>) { BUG(); }
|
- if (unlikely(E)) { BUG(); }
+ BUG_ON(E);
)
@@ expression E,f; @@
(
if (<... f(...) ...>) { BUG(); }
|
- if (E) { BUG(); }
+ BUG_ON(E);
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
prev = rsv;
}
printk("Window map complete.\n");
- if (bad)
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(bad);
}
#define rsv_window_dump(root, verbose) \
__rsv_window_dump((root), (verbose), __func__)